Fundamentals

EBITDA vs SDE: Which Earnings Figure Should You Value?

2 July 2026 · 7 min read

Using the wrong earnings measure is the most common valuation error in owner-operated businesses — and it usually overstates value by a wide margin.

What each measure means

EBITDA strips out financing and accounting choices to show operating earnings: net profit plus interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. It assumes the business already pays a full market wage to whoever runs it.

SDE goes one step further and adds back one working owner's total compensation and discretionary spend. It answers a different question: how much cash is available to a single owner-operator who buys the business and works in it.

The rule of thumb

  • Owner-operated, typically under about $1m of earnings, buyer will work in the business — value on SDE
  • Management team in place, owner is a passive or strategic figure — value on EBITDA
  • Larger businesses, private equity or trade buyers, debt funding involved — always EBITDA

Why the multiples differ

SDE multiples are lower than EBITDA multiples on the same business because SDE is the larger number. A main-street business might sell for 2.0–3.5x SDE while a comparable business with management sells at 4–6x EBITDA. Applying an EBITDA multiple to an SDE figure inflates value by roughly the size of the owner's package — often several hundred thousand dollars.

If you add back the owner's salary, you cannot also use a multiple derived from businesses that pay one.

Worked example

A services business reports $180,000 net profit. The owner draws $120,000 but a replacement manager would cost $95,000. Interest is $15,000 and depreciation is $20,000, with $12,000 of genuine maintenance capex.

  • SDE = 180,000 + 15,000 + 20,000 + 120,000 = $335,000
  • EBITDA = SDE less the market manager wage of 95,000 = $240,000
  • At 2.8x SDE the business is worth about $938,000
  • At 4.0x EBITDA it is worth about $960,000 — a sensible cross-check

When the two approaches land close together, the multiples you chose are internally consistent. A large gap means one of them is wrong.

Add-backs buyers will accept

  • Genuinely one-off legal or relocation costs, with evidence
  • Personal vehicles, travel and subscriptions the business will stop paying
  • Above-market related-party rent, adjusted to a market lease
  • Family members on the payroll who do not work in the business

Add-backs buyers will reject

  • Marketing spend the business needs to maintain revenue
  • Repairs that recur every year and are really maintenance capex
  • 'Lost' revenue the owner says they could have earned
  • Anything without a general-ledger trail

Related reading